Connect with us


Bulkachuwa’s son has been campaigning for Buhari, Atiku, PDP tell tribunal



The Peoples Democratic Party and its presidential competitor, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, on Friday told the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal in Abuja that Aliyu Haidar Abubakar, child of the President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa, battled for President Muhammadu Buhari in front of the February 23 presidential survey.

They asserted that Abubakar was not just a card-conveying individual from the All Progressives Congress, yet besides, challenged the gathering’s governorship crucial decision in Gombe State.

They educated the court that they had joined the Facebook printout of the mass of the said organic child of Bulkachuwa demonstrating his crusade posts, photos and notices soliciting votes in favor of himself as a governorship hopeful and Buhari’s re-appointment offer to their movement as a display.

READ ALSO: We’ll help The Gambia learn TSA – Nigeria Government

The candidates asserted, as recently expressed in the letter which the PDP on May 9 sent to the judge’s office, that her better half, Adamu Bulkachuwa, won a senatorial seat in the National Assembly survey, held nearby the February 23 decision, on the stage of the APC.

They accordingly expressed in a movement recorded before the five-person council that Justice Bulkachuwa’s nearby family binds to top APC individuals would upset her from dealing with the procedures of the court without inclination.

The applicants demanded Justice Bulkachuwa was precluding herself as a part and leader of the council.

Requesting her substitution on the board, they asked her to recuse herself from a further interest in the procedures of the council.

The oath ousted to by the Deputy National Secretary of the PDP, Emmanuel Agbo, recorded in help of the movement read to some degree, “I realize that as a companion of Adamu Bulkachuwa, Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa is so firmly identified with Adamu Bulkachuwa that she can’t decently hear and decide the moment appeal without inspiring the doubt and tension of OK thinking people, including myself.

“The Court of Appeal has more than 80 judges who are capable and able to take part in the meeting and assurance of the surviving request without Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa.

“I additionally realize that her natural child, Aliyu Haidar Abubakar, is a card-conveying individual from the third respondent (APC) and he challenged the essential governorship race of the third respondent in Gombe State.

“Appended hereto and checked Exhibit 2 is a printout made today from the Facebook page named Aliyu Haidar Abubakar Volunteer Group containing his crusade blurbs, photos and different posts demonstrating his battle messages for himself and the second respondent, both of whom challenged on the stage of the third respondent.

READ ALSO: BREAKING: Airport Safety: Enugu Govt shuts down Emene Market

“I likewise connect hereto and stamped Exhibit 3 a printout of a Daily Post online news production in which Aliyu Abubakar was conspicuously included as the child of Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa and who challenged the governorship essential of Gombe State on the stage of the third respondent.”

They included that Bauchi State, which was one of the three senatorial areas Bulkachuwa’s significant other would speak to at the Senate when sworn in, “is one of the central states in which the solicitors/candidates have all supposed that appointive infractions happened.”

They subsequently looked for “a request that Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa, President of the Court of Appeal, and the directing equity of the board hearing request numbered CA/PEPC/2019 be recused from further sitting or taking an interest in the procedures in this request and be supplanted by another equity of this decent court to sit in her place to hear and decide the request”.

Bulkachuwa, who drove a five-person board of the council amid Wednesday’s procedures had guided the applicants to document a formal application that would be heard and administered upon in the open court.

In a letter marked by its National Chairman, Uche Secondus, and it’s National Secretary, Umaru Tsauri, the PDP grumbled that Bulkachuwa could have by a remark she made amid the debut sitting of the court on May 8 prejudged its appeal testing the result of the presidential race.

It expressed that Bulkachuwa’s case in her discourse such that there would dependably be grumblings regardless of how a decision was well-led had “shook” its trust in the board driven by her.

Secondus and the National Publicity Secretary of the PDP, Kola Ologbondiyan, went to Wednesday’s procedures.

Bulkachuwa seemed to have at first ignored the before letter sent by the PDP requesting that she pull back from the board until the applicants’ lead counsel, Dr. Livy Uzoukwu (SAN), mentioned a gathering between the board individuals and the agents of the lawful groups of the masses to the case on Wednesday.

Uzoukwu made the solicitation for the gathering not long after legal counselors declared their appearances toward the start of Wednesday’s procedures.

The attorneys speaking to the respondents – Independent National Electoral Commission, President Muhammadu Buhari, and APC – did not contradict the solicitation for the gathering.

Boss Wole Olanipekun (SAN) drove Buhari’s lawful group, while Mr. Yunus Usman (SAN) drove the INEC’s group, and Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) APC’s group.

READ ALSO: BREAKING: FG to close down Enugu Airport, gives reasons

Ten attorneys, with two, speaking to every one of the PDP, Atiku, INEC, Buhari and the APC met with the board individuals in chambers.

Toward the finish of the gathering, Bulkachuwa while reporting the choice of the board following the meeting with the legal advisors, said Uzoukwu mentioned that she ought to recuse herself from the board at the meeting.

She said the solicitation by Uzoukwu depended on the reasons referred to by the PDP in its letter prior sent to her on May 9.

She said since the issue was at that point in the open space, the board had chosen to have the problem treated transparently.

Uzoukwu said on Wednesday his group would record a formal application with that impact on Thursday.

The respondents’ legal counselors said they would require time to react to the application.

The court at that point guided the solicitors to record their application and deferred till May 22 for its hearing.

In consistency with the mandate, the movement marked by an individual from the solicitors’ legitimate group, Prof Maxwell Gidado (SAN), was documented on Thursday.

The movement was served on the three respondents on Friday, another individual from the solicitors’ lawful group, Chief Chris Uche (SAN), affirmed to one of our journalists on Friday.

The respondents are relied upon to record their answers to the movement on Monday.

The request mutually recorded by Atiku and the PDP is one of the four documented before the council to challenge Buhari’s triumph at the survey.


First Pedia - Copyright © 2022 - All Rights Reserved.