Connect with us

NEWS

UI School hijab crisis: Court fixes June 25 for hearing of preliminary objection

Published

on

UI School hijab crisis: Court fixes June 25 for hearing of preliminary objection

Equity Ladiran Akintola of an Oyo State High Court in Ibadan, on Tuesday fixed June 25 for knowing about starter complaint in a critical human right suit recorded by guardians of female Muslim understudies of University of Ibadan (UI) International School Ibadan (ISI) over refusal of the school to permit their kids wear Hijab on their school regalia.

The first protest was recorded by Mr. Tunde Olutayo, one of the respondents in the issue.

Different respondents in the suit are the University of Ibadan, the School Principal, Mrs. Phebean Olowe, the Chairman, Board of Governors, Professor Abideen Aderinto and Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academics) of the college and three others.

GISTOK.COM reviews that the University of Ibadan International School had a year ago restricted female Muslims understudies in the school from wearing Hijab on their school uniform.

The refusal of the school to permit the understudies later produced a few tingles, which prompted the conclusion of the school for some days.

The Muslim guardians thus for the benefit of their wards sued the organization. The guardians included: Taofeek Yekinni, Idris Badiru, Sikiru Babarinde, Muideen Akerele, Abdur-Rahman Balogun and nine others.

The candidate’s counsel, Fajimite, in his starting call had said that the activity of the school specialist abuses the candidates’ entitlement to the opportunity of thought, religion and ideal to training as contained in area 38 (1)(a) and 42(1)(a) of the constitution.

He asked the court to announce the persistent refusal of the expert of ISI to permit the female Muslim understudies to wear Hijab on their school uniform as improper and unlawful.

Be that as it may, Olutayo, through his advice, Mr. Jide Owoyemi, additionally recorded an application for expansions of time to permit him to document his procedures and encouraged the court to give it.

Guidance to the candidates, Mr. Hassan Fajimite, told the court that he did not contradict to the application for expansion of time of one of the respondent.

Fajita, be that as it may, said that he was as of late presented with the application for augmentation of time and the primer protest.

He said that he was yet to react to it on purpose of law and that he means to respond to the procedures of the considerable number of respondents in the meantime.

Akintola at that point allowed the application for augmentation of time and suspended the knowledge about the first protest till June 25.

Trending

First Pedia - Copyright © 2022 - All Rights Reserved.